Posted by Lil' Viv on July 12, 2001 at 00:09:20:
In Reply to: AVL TREE STUFF posted by Aaron on July 11, 2001 at 15:33:52:
I got mine all happy and running, too . . . thanks to Aaron for his GodSend of a test case. =) Here are the results the autoscript sent me . . . (PROJECT_ONE_REVISITED)
This is a message from the automatic grading script.
The time is now Wed Jul 11 18:13:34 CDT 2001
Your code was successfully compiled.
Your code self-reports your ssn as xxxxxxxxx .
Your code ran normally during the first (small) test
Your code created perfectly correct output on the small test.
Your code ran normally during the robust test.
Your code created perfectly correct output on the robust test.
Here are the results of the timing run:
Analyzer: /u/dvw/icount
Version: 1.2 (30/Mar/93) (shade version: 5.25 V8 SPARC ELF32 (14/Feb/95))
Uname: fynbo.cs.utexas.edu sun4u SunOS 5.7 Generic_106541-09
Start: Wed Jul 11 18:13:46 2001
Application: ./test.exe 1 test_one.txt
Application Instructions: 39536
Stop: Wed Jul 11 18:13:46 2001
Instructions: 39536
Time: 0.040 usr 0.030 sys 0.076 real 92.308%
Speed: 564.800 KIPS
Here are the results of the timing run:
Analyzer: /u/dvw/icount
Version: 1.2 (30/Mar/93) (shade version: 5.25 V8 SPARC ELF32 (14/Feb/95))
Uname: fynbo.cs.utexas.edu sun4u SunOS 5.7 Generic_106541-09
Start: Wed Jul 11 18:13:47 2001
Application: ./test.exe 1 test_two.txt
Application Instructions: 254344911
Stop: Wed Jul 11 18:14:05 2001
Instructions: 254344911
Time: 18.680 usr 0.020 sys 18.766 real 99.646%
Speed: 13601.332 KIPS
compiles 1 0.522233
final 5.22233 2.16714
largeloss 0 2.44949
largeoff 0 2.44949
largeperfect 2.54345e+08 2.26597
largespeed 2.54345e+08 2.26597
official lilviv 523350072
partial 9.81981 1.00521
smallloss 0 0.973365
smalloff 0 0.96699
smallperfect 39536 1.65279
smallspeed 39536 0.403451
I xx'ed out the SSN on purpose . . . but, that worked, too. =P